The other day, I photographed a very simple image of a Starfish on a beach local to me – what fascinated me about the image was the amount of detail I could see when I zoomed in on the shot, and I wasn’t even using a macro lens. The Starfish itself wasn’t something I had ever taken a photo of before, and I was quite pleased with the depth of information the camera gave to me.
The comment passed to me, on line, read as follows:- “This could have been taken on a mobile phone, and been just as good”. I was a tad miffed…. as with the file I had, I could have printed it up to probably A1 size, which I certainly could not have done off a mobile, but then the commenter didn’t know that.
Zoomed in detail…
The thing is, he knew scant little about what I had used to get this shot:- and therein lies the problem …… sometimes……
The other night, I visited a camera club and we talked, in detail, about images, and what sort of shots would do well in competitions. Members had brought along sets of DPI’s for comment, and we worked through them for the whole evening. The intent from me was to make people think, and talk about photographs, in a constructive way, but also to acknowledge that some were not ‘keepers’ in the competition arena.
it was quite hard to get people to talk initially – There is a reluctance from some people to comment on an image – even in a ‘safe’ environment. I think they may feel awkward, or not qualified to pass an opinion.
I’d love it if camera clubs ran critique sessions more regularly – to help members see what the common faults are. Examples might be as simple as the main subject being out of focus, or aircraft in the air with ‘frozen’ propellers. Small parts of trees, or other organic / inorganic things impinging on the edges of images, lamp posts growing out of heads, blown out areas – or simply a confusing image, where the focus of attention is lost.
Photographers have an invested interest in their work, I appreciate that, and they can carry a lot of emotional baggage. Images mean a lot to them, and time and effort has been taken to get what is now being put in front of club and judge. I try to explain that this effort and emotion doesn’t always show in an image to an independent third party, who has no idea of the mud they trudged through, or the agonies and pain to get THAT shot. The photographic idea can be as brilliant as can be – but if not executed properly will fail, no matter how much the photographer loves it. In the end, it’s the photograph that is shown, with no history that the observer sees.
A gentleman was at great pains to explain to me exactly how he got his shot – but in the end the difficulty level doesn’t gain extra points. As one judge said to me, some years ago – “difficulty level ? – that isn’t my problem”. At the time I was quite put out, but with hindsight (which is a marvellous thing), he was absolutely correct.
In the end it goes back to what I said in my previous blog post – you need to trust the people you ask about images – but sometimes listen to what other people say too – listen, and don’t just ignore the comment – for all you know, at that moment, they might be right, even if you don’t realise it for a long time afterwards!
If you enjoy this blog, please subscribe – I’d love to hear your comments!