In the last 8 months I finally succumbed and subscribed to Adobe Photoshop and Lightroom CC – I’d resisted, and resisted till in the end I was backed into a corner. Two things happened – one piece of software that I had as a plug-in, updated itself, and then refused to work with CS6. It had gone beyond what CS6 could do. Secondly, Lighroom did an automatic update, and suddenly the RAW convertor would no longer talk to CS6, and I was left making a DNG file, in addition to the RAW file, and finally then a conversion to JPEG.
Frustrated, I decided to take the plunge and go down the subscription route. First thing that happened was I got an upgrade to CS6 to the ‘Extended’ version (which sits happily now, doing nothing on my hard drive), the next thing was that LR CC completely overwrote the version of LR6 that I had got already.
In the short term, this isn’t a problem, but if I do decide that the subscription method is not for me, then I’ve no idea if I can recover the version 6 I had before.
I suppose the other issue would be that changes I made in the ‘new’ software won’t be recognised by the old.
Adobe continually tell me that the new software is quicker, better, and faster….. and as a retired full time photographer, I appreciate the need for speed in processing. Nowadays though, I can relax and process my images for my use, in my own time. Which is wonderful.
Is faster necessarily better though? I’ve spent some time thinking about how I looked at image making in my time with film. First of all, I was much more careful about what I shot – 36 on a roll – fewer with medium format. Twin lens Rolliflex – 10 at a time. Then the film itself. Dark room, winding the unexposed film onto a reel – dropping something on the floor, and trying to find it again. Waiting for it to develop – rinse, add fixer, rinse again – fingers crossed, and out it came – and that was just the start….. Check negatives, and look at printing – enlarger, dodge, burn, photo paper – (the sort I saw for sale on ebay a while ago out of its black plastic bag – ouch), and then, the magic of seeing a print magically appear on the paper in the developing tray – fix it, rinse it, dry it…… lets have another look under a light that’s not red………..
Don’t get me wrong, I love the digital darkroom – working in the daylight, and able to walk away for a cup of tea when I want to. It’s cooler, and I don’t miss the chemical smells.
I love taking time with my images, but that’s not the attitude the advertising bods would have us ache for. Rush rush rush…. and I see it all the time in on-line images. Tilted horizons, underexposed, overexposed, burnt out, over processed….. This is NOT art, this is careless. More processing does not make for a better photo – whanging up the clarity will never, ever fix a badly composed photograph.
I qualify this by saying that sometimes there is art… and that is very much a personal thing – careful, artistic processing most definitely has its place – but this is by people who genuinely know what they are about.
Begone, you slide whangers – let’s try to tone it down a little – 100% clarity, combined with 100% vibrance really isn’t the way to go……..