An all new look blog.
Fingers crossed it’s all sorted. If you can take a look, I’d much appreciate it. Please let me know if you spot any glaring errors…….
I look forward to hearing from you…..
An all new look blog.
Fingers crossed it’s all sorted. If you can take a look, I’d much appreciate it. Please let me know if you spot any glaring errors…….
I look forward to hearing from you…..
Is clicking the shutter really enough ? Do we spend too much time post processing ? Should we be ‘pure’ in our art. What comes in the lens, comes out in the print….
I’d say NO. Clicking the shutter for me, is only the beginning of the process.
Whilst digitally enhancing images has become far easier, it’s nothing new. The practice has existed since photography began. There was an exhibition in New York in 2012 which examined this whole thing. Click HERE for the link. The exhibition featured images created in the period 1840 – 1990. Look again at the first date…… 1840 !!! The photographs were altered using a variety of techniques including multiple exposures, combination printing (images used from more than one negative), painting, and retouching. Nothing new really here, apart from the speed – it was much slower then to get the same results as nowadays.
Unknown Artist, American School
Man on Rooftop with Eleven Men in Formation on His Shoulders
Gelatin silver print
Collection of George Eastman House
Photo Courtesy: The Metropolitan Museum of Art
The earliest example I could find was this one…. a two headed man – created in 1855 !
So why is manipulation such a huge problem for some people?
My all time hero – Ansel Adams was one of the greatest landscape photographers of all time. He was probably one of the perfectionists. His images were printed, edited, printed, edited, and printed again. His ‘zone’ system is complex, and, for his time, revolutionary. Google him – look at his images before and after editing. One of his most famous pictures – Moonrise over Hernandez, New Mexico’ – is a perfect example of his post processing skills.
So, next time the ‘purists’ start shouting about images coming straight out of the camera, because that’s how it should be done, just remind them that although sometimes it’s done that way – most times it’s not. That old adage that ‘the camera never lies’ is bunkum. It lies most of the time.
The reality is that the people who make the cameras in Japan, or where-ever are the people who are ultimately telling you what your image will look like – especially if you are shooting in JPEG. They decide the colours, the saturation, the sharpness. You decide on the crop.
The ultimate decision of course is the photographers own. There is no right and wrong way to process (or not) your own images. There is also no need to preach about perfect out of camera images – nor is there a need for people to stop manipulating images just as much as they would like.
There’s space for all of us…….
No go out and MAKE some photographs…………
Maurice Guibert (French, 1856–1913)
Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec (French, Albi 1864–1901 Saint-André-du-Bois)
Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec as Artist and Model
Gelatin silver print
Philadelphia Museum of Art, Gift of Henry P. Mcllhenny, 1982-14-2
Are you a fool? Why do you think you are, or not, as the case may be?
In my head, the fool usually rules – he challenges the norm, and his job is to question the rules, conventions and so on, that keep you thinking the same things.
Sometimes, in photography, you have to let your head rule, let the fool inside you out.
As an adult, I think it’s harder to do than when you were a child. Children act the fool all the time, and everyone smiles and chuckles and says “how cute” – once grown, the same actions are seen as unhealthy and immature. Now I’m not suggesting for one minute that we all go around acting like a 5 year old all the time, but I am suggesting that you let your mind wander. Laugh at yourself.
I had an idea a while ago – not an original one I hasten to add – but I’d seen images created of people apparently levitating. A quick check on the web pretty much told me how they were achieved, and then, with the aid of a pal, we set off to see what we could do. It was harder than we both thought, to get the light right, to get a natural looking lift, and more importantly, to get perspectives right so it ‘looked’ like we’d got a person to float.
I was reminded of a quote I’d read
“If you tell people where to go, but not how to get there, you’ll be amazed at the results”
And that’s how we were – we had a rough idea where to go, but it was up to us to come up with a ‘fool’ proof route.
A problem was posed, and we had complete freedom in our imaginations as to how to solve it.
At school, we learn that failure is not an option – you are scored throughout your life – tests, exams, sales figures, business goals. We learn to be right with only one answer as often as possible. We keep ‘mistakes’ to a minimum. You have learned not only to not make mistakes, but you learn to not put yourself in a situation where you might fail.
The photographic judge looks at your photo, and doesn’t like it – he/she scores it 8/20 – you are deflated. You won’t make that mistake again – you won’t enter a competition again – at its worst – you won’t take any more photographs if that’s the attitude.
The question is – Are you afraid to fail? Are you afraid to try something new in your photo journey because of that fear?
What I see with most amateur photographers (and by that I mean new starters mostly) is that they post online everything they shoot – the good, the bad and the ugly….. The people who are rated more highly, are the ones who (apparently) shoot good images all the time. WRONG – they are the curators, the people who only post their good shots. You only see what you are allowed to see – because yes, they make as many mistakes as the rest of you – it’s just that you don’t see them.
So, be brave, be curious, make mistakes and play the fool.
My experiment with levitation, by the way, not only led me on an interesting journey through the ‘how did they do that’ process, but ultimately led me to images that I like, and have entered into national competitions, with some degree of success.
Enjoy being the fool……
A few weeks ago, I wrote about photographers who were doing the same thing year after year, and me thinking that they were not as interesting, as those who moved on, tried different things, and were willing to experiment.
To some extent, I take that back. There are photographers who are interesting, and have been, and will remain interesting, no matter what they do – mainly because they are very good at a particular genre. I would however, bet my last dollar, that at some point they have tried different things, and that they have in some areas failed (See my fear of failure post).
I realised only the other day, that I’m pretty guilty of this myself. Now, I’m always happy to have a go at something new, something different – and at least try, even if I do fail at it. But, yesterday, I drove for just under 3 hours to get to Wollaton Hall, where there were Red Deer, in the hopes of seeing some of the rut. I’ve done this for the last 6 years (not the long drive, just the photos), and I’ve had some pretty good images. What dawned on me yesterday, was that I was trying to do the same things I was doing before I moved home into deepest Lincolnshire.
Where I lived before, for example – deer parks were pretty easy to get to. Lyme Park was 20 minutes away, and then there was Tatton, and Dunham Massey – all National Trust, but then I was a member, and all three were accessible for early morning, and evening shoots. Here, now, Bradgate Park, and Wollaton Hall are probably two of the few places with a Red Deer Herd, and I made two mistakes yesterday.
Nearly 3 hours there, three hours on site, and same back. Exhausted? Yes, Pictures? Yes – Good Pictures? – Weeeelllll…. maybe some pretty OK ones.
Bradgate Park Leicester is 84 miles and 2 hours. I went there last year, and yes, it was better access, time and more deer activity.
I did wonder as I crawled into bed last night whether I shouldn’t reconsider what I was photographing on a weekly basis. I’ve not adapted my photographic behaviour to my new location – I’m still doing some things I was doing before, and maybe, not as well – just because of the distances involved.
I’ve learned the hard way – I need to adapt to what I have now, and move on, accept the changes, and next week, I’m back in the car, and looking for Stags…….
“Every day is a new challenge for a photographer. Will it be a portrait, sports, fashion or something else completely? And no matter what that day brings, it must always end the same way – with a great shot.” I read this only today……
And that’s what I’d like to happen in my world. There’s always that old adage that you are only as good as your last shot.. but the problem as I see it, is that a lot of amateur photographers, post online everything (and I mean everything) they took on a shoot.
We are constantly bombarded with a miriad of images – and photographers asking which we prefer – the colour one, or the black and white ? The landscape orientation, or the portrait? The processed image, or the straight out of the camera?
Now I understand the need sometimes to get another persons opinion – but in the end analysis it has to be what YOU, the photographer like, and not what some unknown person on the other side of the globe has to say about your pictures. Mostly it’s about personal preference and so posting your two (sometimes pretty poor) photographs asking for a choice, is a bit like asking what shall I eat today – an apple or a banana? Some will like one, some the other – so in the end you are really no further forward.
There was a group on Facebook, that I joined a few months ago, as I was looking for information on Photoshop and Lightroom – and thought that I might get some ideas as to how to work more effectively with CC. Instead, I was bombarded with “which do you prefer” images, and after only a week or so, I just abandoned the group to its own devices.
I wondered why the photographers were so unable to make their own decisions, and came to the conclusion that it’s to do with self image. The uncertainty of their work, and the fear of rejection in the real world. After all, how many images posted on Facebook, or Flickr or other photo sharing sites have negative comments posted below them? That would be incredibly few. The problem here is that the more people say “wow”, “incredible image”, “amazing work”, to poor images, the more the photographer has the self belief that what they are producing is actually good, and so they continue to produce more of it.
There are of course the photographers whose work is most definitely amazing, and incredible – and all the epithets that go with them are true – but the trouble is, they sometimes get buried in the sea of unexceptional work, though some just rise to the surface and become photographers impossible to ignore… their work just ‘shines’.
What’s the answer?
Three answers really…..
Lastly, I would say, stop posting EVERYTHING from your last shoot, holiday, portrait session – just give us the good ones to see. Deep down, most people know what’s good and what isn’t. The trick is to sort out the wheat from the chaff….. and if you really can’t do that…. then yes, ask a friend… but only if you are prepared to hear the unadulterated truth.
One of the most frequent complaints I hear from photographers is ‘there’s nothing there to photograph’ – wherever “there” happens to be.
I moved over to Lincolnshire about 2 years ago now, from the fringes of the Peak District – and on asking local photographers where I could go to shoot, I heard the same thing over and over – there’s nothing here – Lincolnshire is too flat – there’s just nothing of any interest…. ‘you’re so lucky to have lived in the Peak District – we go there for our photography’
So, having realised I wasn’t going to get much help, I decided to do, what I did where I lived before, and that was to make like a tourist, and drive round till I found something interesting. I joined the Lincolnshire Wildlife Trust, and found they had 94 separate reserves and so even if I visited only one a week, that was nearly 2 years worth of exploring.
So deciding to drive around every reserve, even those off the beaten track, I got a good map and started to mark off where I’d been, which roads I’d been down, and not repeat any till I’d covered them all.
Some places were not that exciting, but some I ended up returning to again and again…. and this is what this blog piece is all about.
It WAS a good plan, a great strategy if you will, with the idea that once I’d been down that road – visited that reserve – I didn’t need to go again. After all, there were plenty more to visit. What I hadn’t thought through though, was that I was ignoring the changes in light, the season, the weather, and the changes in me.
I visited places – thought they were pretty, but didn’t photograph them as I should have – thinking I could go back and get the same picture later – tomorrow – but you never do, and when, and if you do – its changed. That tree fell down, buildings went up, the pond dried up. It might be different when you go back, it might be better, or worse but it won’t be the same.
It’s important, if you want the right photographs to have repeated access to see things at different times. Of course, if you go on trip abroad, you may only have the one chance to see things, at one time of day. You might be lucky, and get that shot of a lifetime, but mostly, you don’t. You need to be able to plan a return visit, at different times of day, to increase your chances of success.
If you can go to the same place more than once, it might be just the same, but if you’re clever, you will target that place for different times of day, different seasons, and so on, increasing your chances of getting a better shot.
Everywhere is interesting if you get the right weather, the right time, the right mood.
The familiar can be just as exciting as the unfamiliar – if you let it.
Spend time getting to know the places you have access to, and the unusual conditions that you haven’t let yourself experience yet.
We live in a county that is a holiday mecca – caravans, mobile homes, great beaches. People wouldn’t come here if it wasn’t attractive in some way. There’s probably a lifetime of photography within 50 miles of where we all live. Travel is good for for our photographic vision, but local views, and our experience of them, can help us too.
Images – Covenham St Bartholomew (colour) and Fotherby Top (mono)
When I was younger, I was fascinated by the work that went on in my father’s darkroom. He was an avid photographer, and shot weddings, and some commercial work in engineering workshops. I would go with him sometimes, on these outings, and carry gear. Sometimes I’d get to do exciting things in the workshops – like driving the overhead cranes and watching steel plate being rolled. I think that the health and safety people would be wringing their hands in despair nowadays.
I would watch in fascination later, as images miraculously appeared on sheets of paper in developing fluid – I spent my childhood surrounded by bottles of developer, fixer, film canisters, and rolls of drying film (pegged up in the bathroom)………
Funnily enough, I hated the entire process – the smells were horrible – sitting in a dark room (maybe with a red light for company) – no ventilation (well we were sat in what amounted to a large cupboard, converted for the process). It was hot, sweaty and uncomfortable. It was the image making – the appearance of the darks and lights on the paper that was the fascinating part.
Later on, even in the digital era – I had to relearn how to process both film and pictures at college. It slowed me down, but I still didn’t like the smells…….
What film taught me, was how to be patient, and how to slow down, and how to work towards a goal that may never be fully achieved.
I’m constantly looking for that one picture, the one image that will set me aside from everyone else, that will allow me to be ‘discovered’ – so as film processing has influenced my photographic journey, so digital processing has allowed me to make more mistakes, faster than ever…….
Even those who make mistakes, and fall flat on their face, are at least moving forward. It’s productive in photography to experiment, to try different media, and be willing to fail. I would go so far as to say that the most fascinating photographers I have met, have all been experimenters, and have all failed at something.
The photographers who are the least interesting, in my head, are the ones who are doing exactly the same thing they were doing 10 years ago. They are the ones who are least willing to fail, the ones least willing to experiment. The ones least willing to stray outside their comfort zone. It’s a great idea to introduce randomness in your life.
A photographer said to me recently – “It’s great working with you, you have so many zany creative ideas” – which was lovely to hear, as it means I’m moving forwards, and not backwards, or worse, standing still.
The thing is….. it doesn’t matter if I fail… it really doesn’t matter if the experiment, the idea, the trial, doesn’t work – what have I lost? I’ve probably gained some different ideas, maybe even worked out what I can do to make the next shoot successful. Maybe it didn’t work THIS time, but maybe it will work next time.
Go out in the wrong weather, with the wrong gear, the wrong location, the wrong mood. It will introduce randomness into your life, encourages discovery – takes it outside your comfort zone.
The idea of failure should push us forward as photographers. Failure can lead us to success as photographers and we (deep down) know that it’s true.
The image below, has been a successful one for me – it was an accident. I’d seen similar images and with some research worked out pretty much how they were done. Following the idea through, resulted in this image. It’s won a number of competitions, and involved me in a lot of conversations about ‘how it was done’ (and if you want to know how it was done – just drop me a line – it’s a bit long to ramble on about here).
Introduce some randomness into your creative process – it will increase the number of ‘failures’ but, if we pay attention to them, we will find more potential that would normally come our way.
We’ve all heard it…… the judge looks at the photograph and calmly states that if you’d moved about three steps to the left or the right, the composition would have changed for the better…… and we all know, that in moving those three steps, the photographer would be heading, head first, down a flight of steps – falling off a cliff – stepping into deep water – or stepping into something unfortunate.
We all laugh, but what should we be really be expecting from our judges…. ?
To quote one example ”
So, what is the judge looking for?
If you’re not sure how an image looks, get a friend to look at them with you – a second pair of eyes can make all the difference. If you are a member of a camera club, show your images there before you enter a competition. I’ve been told that if you turn your photo upside down and look at it, you’ll see more errors – personally I’ve not tried it, but it’s worth a second of your time.
And finally – enjoy your photography – I tend to think of photography competitions a bit like taking your dog to a dog show. When you lose, you bring your dog home, and you love him all the same. Similar with photographs… let the judge see it – take the critique in a good spirit, bring it home, and maybe still love it for what it is, and the fact that it means something to you -but also learn from the comments – you just might be surprised……
One of the things that I hear all the time is that the camera does not make the photograph, the photographer does. I want to reiterate this again –
“It is NOT the camera”…… honestly, it’s not.
I judge a lot of photographic competitions, and I look at a LOT of pictures. I also, (given the opportunity) look at the EXIF information. (EXIF stands for Exchangeable Image File Format) – On each and every shot, the camera records not only the date and time, but all the other camera settings used to record the photo. That includes the shutter speed, aperture setting, ISO setting, if the flash was used, the focal length and lots lots more. Lots of web applications allow you to see the EXIF information – as does Lightroom and Photoshop. So when I’m given lots of files to look at, I always check this information as a matter of course.
It’s not that I’m being particularly nosy, it’s just that I’m interested to see what cameras people are using. I don’t use this as part of the judging process – after all, I’m only really interested in the end result when I’m scoring, or marking images.
There’s an interesting conclusion I’ve come to – it doesn’t matter what the camera is…. I’ve seen great shots taken on an i-pad, and technically very poor shots taken with a Hasselblad. There is in fact no relationship between the image, and the camera it was shot with.
The only time it really does matter – is when you come to produce prints. You can get fairly decent ones from an iphone – great ones from Canon or Nikon flagship cameras – and the issue here is size. Size matters.
Projected images are sized to the projector – and we can get away with images shot on the ipad, and compact cameras – however, if you want to produce a 40” print, you’re going to need more pixels, more quality, and a better camera. But for smaller prints, maybe the ones you have in your home, any camera is capable of making images. And, if you really want large images, then make a panorama, and stitch them all together…… think though, how many really large images do you want, or can fit into your home.
Camera quality counts of course, but more important in my mind is the lens.
Some photographers think that the better the camera, the better the picture – is that so? No – it’s all down to clever marketing from the big companies. They would have you believe that you can’t function without the latest in their new range. The added gizmo – the higher ISO capability – the GPS – the wifi…… Does the average photographer really need ALL of those things.
Essentially, you should choose the camera you use, not for all its features, or even how expensive it is – you should choose based on what you want that camera to do for YOU, and importantly how it feels in your hand. Does it ‘fit’ you – is it intuitive to use.
I would always choose a new lens, over a new body. In the end analysis – camera bodies will come and go, but the glass will stay with you. Buy the best you can afford, as here you most definitely get what you pay for. Remember that there is no such thing as a 50-500 zoom, that is going to beat (in terms of image quality) a 50mm prime.
After all that’s done – it’s down to software, and what the photographer does with it.
Photographers largely fall into two camps – those that process, and those that don’t.
There’s a group of guys on Facebook, who swear by their ‘SOOC’ (Straight out of camera shots) – these are the ones who allow the camera to do all the work – though admittedly they are swapping lens, and changing focal lengths during a long exposure time. A very skillful business. Any in camera processing though that goes on, is the work of Japanese engineers at the time the camera is built – and many good results come from that………
Secondly, there are the people for whom the taking of an image is only the start of the process – images are broken down, and put back together in new and creative ways. This might be as simple as cropping, or as complex as combining many different photographs into one image.
This isn’t about heavy handed work, and the ‘lets slap on a filter’, it’s about totally transforming what they took at the outset into something different.
The extreme is the over the top HDR (High Dynamic Range) images – usually created by taking a number of shots of the same image at different exposures and the combining them together to create something altogether otherworldly. Sometimes it works, but mostly it hurts my eyes.
In conclusion – I’d say that I’m very honoured to be allowed to see so many images that other people have taken. I love seeing their creative ideas. There is so much to learn from what other people shoot, how they shoot it, and what they shoot it with.