A comparative review…..
I have a friend (just the one) – who shoots film almost exclusively. He says that you can’t get the same quality of image from digital that you can from a film camera. He insists he’s right – won’t hear a word said against film (and I’m not going to here either).
The thing about this, is that the production of an image, has nothing to do with the medium on which it is taken. It’s a mechanical thing, whichever way you look at it.
There was a time, when I bought, shot, developed and printed from film. There’s a time now when I buy cards, shoot, process and print digital images – and the difference is? I can do it in the daylight, instead of sitting in (what was at the time) a stuffy little built in wardrobe, with the smell of chemicals wafting on the air.
When I did my photography courses at college – one of the first things we did, was go straight back to the lab, and process a film – ahh, you say – nostalgia….. nope – same old darkness (in a larger room to be sure) but with the same chemical smell that lingers long after you get home.
‘But”, my friend argues “we did it all ourselves, all the famous photographers of our time did”… well sorry to disillusion you…… but most of them had assistants, even if they oversaw the whole process.
Think this way as well. We didn’t make the film, as much as we didn’t make the memory card. We didn’t make the lens for the camera, or the electronics that are in there today. Someone somewhere along the line helped us to make that photograph. If we digital shooters produce a JPG, then the camera has done some editing in advance – if we shoot RAW, then we end up with the equivalent of a negative, to edit as we wish. I suspect it’s no coincidence that Lightroom has a ‘Develop’ module, or a library for that matter.
What I notice is that my friend does not print his own images, nor does he process his own film, and yet argues that his image making process, is more ‘pure’ than mine,
As photographers, and creators of images, I don’t think it matters if we leave some things to our virtual assistants – get our images printed elsewhere for example – it is entirely our choice, but if we leave the film to be processed into prints at the time we send it off -then we are leaving the final edit to the chemistry lab operators.
In the end though, it’s our creative vision, and the print, (if we choose to go that far) is our end product.
Put a film print and a digital print side by side, and most times I would defy you to tell which was which !
Feel free to argue the point – I’d be interested……..